RepoPilot

dotnetcore/util vs peass-ng/peass-ng

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, util and peass-ng both show mixed maintenance signals. util last saw a commit 1 year ago with 3+ active contributors, while peass-ng last saw a commit 1 month ago with 9+ active contributors. util is MIT-licensed while peass-ng is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

dotnetcore/util

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 3 active contributors
  • MIT licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

peass-ng/peass-ng

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 4d ago
  • 9 active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

utilpeass-ng
Stars4,61819,838
Last commit1y ago1mo ago
LicenseMITOther
Open issues31
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%8%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? dotnetcore/util · peass-ng/peass-ng

Ask AI about dotnetcore/util vs peass-ng/peass-ng

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.