RepoPilot

dragonflydb/dragonfly vs nevcairiel/lavfilters

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, dragonfly and lavfilters both show mixed maintenance signals. dragonfly was committed to 1 week ago with 13+ active contributors, while lavfilters was committed to 2 weeks ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

dragonflydb/dragonfly

Mixed

Open vulnerabilities flagged by OpenSSF Scorecard

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete

  • Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
  • Last commit today
  • 13 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

nevcairiel/lavfilters

Mixed

Solo project — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…

  • Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
  • GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No tests detected in the complete Git tree
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • GPL-2.0 licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

dragonflylavfilters
Stars31,4369,129
Last commit10d ago19d ago
LicenseUnknownGPL-2.0
Open issues298107
Has testsNo
Has CINo
Test coverage22%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeAC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? dragonflydb/dragonfly · nevcairiel/lavfilters

Ask AI about dragonflydb/dragonfly vs nevcairiel/lavfilters

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.