dromara/sa-token vs supertokens/supertokens-core
supertokens/supertokens-core shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, supertokens-core shows healthier maintenance signals than sa-token. supertokens-core rates Healthy overall while sa-token rates Mixed. sa-token was committed to 1 week ago with 1+ active contributor, while supertokens-core was committed to 1 week ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dromara/sa-token
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
supertokens/supertokens-core
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| sa-token | supertokens-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,037 | 15,295 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 13d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 107 | 142 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 61% | 92% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? dromara/sa-token · supertokens/supertokens-core
Ask AI about dromara/sa-token vs supertokens/supertokens-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.