ds300/patch-package vs ruvnet/ruflo
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, patch-package and ruflo both show mixed maintenance signals. patch-package last saw a commit 8 months ago with 10+ active contributors, while ruflo was committed to 2 days ago with 1+ active contributor. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ds300/patch-package →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
ruvnet/ruflo →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| patch-package | ruflo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11,177 | 60,015 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 2d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 278 | 644 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 1% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ds300/patch-package · ruvnet/ruflo
Ask AI about ds300/patch-package vs ruvnet/ruflo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.