duixcom/duix-mobile vs lizardbyte/sunshine
lizardbyte/sunshine shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, sunshine shows healthier maintenance signals than duix-mobile. sunshine rates Healthy overall while duix-mobile rates Mixed. duix-mobile last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors, while sunshine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. duix-mobile is Other-licensed while sunshine is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
duixcom/duix-mobile →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
lizardbyte/sunshine →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| duix-mobile | sunshine | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,025 | 36,974 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 56 | 106 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 7% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? duixcom/duix-mobile · lizardbyte/sunshine
Ask AI about duixcom/duix-mobile vs lizardbyte/sunshine
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.