RepoPilot

duixcom/duix-mobile vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus

thealgorithms/c-plus-plus shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, c-plus-plus shows healthier maintenance signals than duix-mobile. c-plus-plus rates Healthy overall while duix-mobile rates Mixed. duix-mobile last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors, while c-plus-plus last saw a commit 8 months ago with 34+ active contributors. duix-mobile is Other-licensed while c-plus-plus is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

duixcom/duix-mobile

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 7 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

thealgorithms/c-plus-plus

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
  • Last commit 7mo ago
  • 34+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

duix-mobilec-plus-plus
Stars8,02534,206
Last commit1mo ago8mo ago
LicenseOtherMIT
Open issues5633
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage7%1%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? duixcom/duix-mobile · thealgorithms/c-plus-plus

Ask AI about duixcom/duix-mobile vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.