RepoPilot

ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, free-programming-books and stable-diffusion-webui-forge both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 79+ active contributors, while stable-diffusion-webui-forge last saw a commit 10 months ago with 26+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while stable-diffusion-webui-forge is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ebookfoundation/free-programming-books

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 79+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
  • CC-BY-4.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard

lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 10mo ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 10mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…

  • Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 10mo ago
  • 26+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

free-programming-booksstable-diffusion-webui-forge
Stars390,43412,545
Last commit3d ago10mo ago
LicenseCC-BY-4.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues791,143
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%16%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.