ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs matterport/mask_rcnn
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, free-programming-books and mask_rcnn both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 79+ active contributors, while mask_rcnn last saw a commit 2 years ago with 31+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while mask_rcnn is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓79+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
matterport/mask_rcnn →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | mask_rcnn | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 390,434 | 25,560 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 2y ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 79 | 2,021 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · matterport/mask_rcnn
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs matterport/mask_rcnn
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.