ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs microsoft/swin-transformer
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, free-programming-books and swin-transformer both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 79+ active contributors, while swin-transformer last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while swin-transformer is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓79+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
microsoft/swin-transformer →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | swin-transformer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 390,434 | 15,902 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 1y ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 79 | 204 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · microsoft/swin-transformer
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs microsoft/swin-transformer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.