ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs nvlabs/stylegan2
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, free-programming-books and stylegan2 both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 80+ active contributors, while stylegan2 last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while stylegan2 is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓80+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 5% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nvlabs/stylegan2 →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | stylegan2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 390,762 | 11,184 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 2y ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 78 | 25 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · nvlabs/stylegan2
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs nvlabs/stylegan2
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.