RepoPilot

ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, free-programming-books and low-light-video-enhancement both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 2 days ago with 79+ active contributors, while low-light-video-enhancement last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while low-light-video-enhancement is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ebookfoundation/free-programming-books

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 79+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
  • CC-BY-4.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard

sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement

Mixed

Stale — last commit 5y ago

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); last commit was 5y ago…

MixedFork & modify

no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…

  • Stale — last commit 5y ago
  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 2 active contributors
  • Other licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms; 1 commit in the last 365 days
  • Fork & modify MixedHealthy if: add a test suite
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

free-programming-bookslow-light-video-enhancement
Stars390,43434
Last commit2d ago4y ago
LicenseCC-BY-4.0Other
Open issues790
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture gradeCA
Cycles00
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement

Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.