ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs stability-ai/generative-models
stability-ai/generative-models shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, generative-models shows healthier maintenance signals than free-programming-books. generative-models rates Healthy overall while free-programming-books rates Mixed. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 80+ active contributors, while generative-models last saw a commit 6 months ago with 24+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while generative-models is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓80+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 5% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
stability-ai/generative-models →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | generative-models | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 390,762 | 27,151 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 6mo ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 78 | 340 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · stability-ai/generative-models
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs stability-ai/generative-models
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.