ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs thealgorithms/python
thealgorithms/python shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, python shows healthier maintenance signals than free-programming-books. python rates Healthy overall while free-programming-books rates Mixed. free-programming-books was committed to 5 days ago with 76+ active contributors, while python was committed to 1 week ago with 65+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while python is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓76+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
thealgorithms/python →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6d ago
- ✓65+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | python | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 389,856 | 221,751 |
| Last commit | 5d ago | 8d ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 80 | 945 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · thealgorithms/python
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs thealgorithms/python
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.