ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs thuml/time-series-library
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, free-programming-books and time-series-library both show mixed maintenance signals. free-programming-books was committed to 3 days ago with 80+ active contributors, while time-series-library last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors. free-programming-books is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while time-series-library is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ebookfoundation/free-programming-books →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓80+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 5% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
thuml/time-series-library →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| free-programming-books | time-series-library | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 390,762 | 12,213 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 2mo ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 78 | 43 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ebookfoundation/free-programming-books · thuml/time-series-library
Ask AI about ebookfoundation/free-programming-books vs thuml/time-series-library
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.