ehang-io/nps vs glanceapp/glance
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ehang-io/nps →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
worst of 4 axescopyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 70% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
What would change the summary?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
glanceapp/glance →
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
worst of 4 axescopyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
Show 5 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
What would change the summary?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| nps | glance | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,053 | 34,041 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 5mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 525 | 315 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 3% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ehang-io/nps · glanceapp/glance
Ask AI about ehang-io/nps vs glanceapp/glance
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.