ellanjiang/gameframework vs ql-win/quicklook
ql-win/quicklook shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, quicklook shows stronger maintenance signals than gameframework. quicklook rates Mixed overall while gameframework rates Concerns. gameframework last saw a commit 2 years ago with 1+ active contributor, while quicklook last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. gameframework is MIT-licensed while quicklook is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ellanjiang/gameframework →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 3y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ql-win/quicklook →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 94% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gameframework | quicklook | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,740 | 23,409 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 11 | 173 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ellanjiang/gameframework · ql-win/quicklook
Ask AI about ellanjiang/gameframework vs ql-win/quicklook
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.