eranyanay/1m-go-websockets vs v2ray/v2ray-core
v2ray/v2ray-core shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, v2ray-core shows healthier maintenance signals than 1m-go-websockets. v2ray-core rates Healthy overall while 1m-go-websockets rates Mixed. 1m-go-websockets last saw a commit 3 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while v2ray-core last saw a commit 2 months ago with 11+ active contributors. 1m-go-websockets is AGPL-3.0-licensed while v2ray-core is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
eranyanay/1m-go-websockets →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 4y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
v2ray/v2ray-core →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| 1m-go-websockets | v2ray-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,989 | 46,849 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 3 | 18 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? eranyanay/1m-go-websockets · v2ray/v2ray-core
Ask AI about eranyanay/1m-go-websockets vs v2ray/v2ray-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.