erebe/wstunnel vs ultraworkers/claw-code
ultraworkers/claw-code shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, claw-code shows healthier maintenance signals than wstunnel. claw-code rates Healthy overall while wstunnel rates Mixed. wstunnel last saw a commit 4 months ago with 8+ active contributors, while claw-code was committed to 4 weeks ago with 11+ active contributors. wstunnel is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while claw-code is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
erebe/wstunnel
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 90% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ultraworkers/claw-code
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wstunnel | claw-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,665 | 195,190 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 29d ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 31 | 41 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 2% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? erebe/wstunnel · ultraworkers/claw-code
Ask AI about erebe/wstunnel vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.