erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs facebookexperimental/recoil
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ducks-modular-redux and recoil both show mixed maintenance signals. ducks-modular-redux last saw a commit 4 years ago with 19+ active contributors, while recoil last saw a commit 1 year ago with 34+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
erikras/ducks-modular-redux
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓19 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
facebookexperimental/recoil
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ducks-modular-redux | recoil | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,548 | 19,437 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 36 | 320 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 34% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? erikras/ducks-modular-redux · facebookexperimental/recoil
Ask AI about erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs facebookexperimental/recoil
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.