erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs nuysoft/mock
nuysoft/mock shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, mock shows stronger maintenance signals than ducks-modular-redux. mock rates Mixed overall while ducks-modular-redux rates Concerns. ducks-modular-redux last saw a commit 4 years ago with 19+ active contributors, while mock last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
erikras/ducks-modular-redux →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 4y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 4y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 4y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓19 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nuysoft/mock →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ducks-modular-redux | mock | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,564 | 19,627 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 2y ago |
| License | — | Other |
| Open issues | 36 | 342 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 52% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? erikras/ducks-modular-redux · nuysoft/mock
Ask AI about erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs nuysoft/mock
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.