erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs sveltejs/kit
sveltejs/kit shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kit shows healthier maintenance signals than ducks-modular-redux. kit rates Healthy overall while ducks-modular-redux rates Concerns. ducks-modular-redux last saw a commit 4 years ago with 19+ active contributors, while kit was committed to 1 day ago with 37+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
erikras/ducks-modular-redux →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 4y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 4y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 4y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓19 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sveltejs/kit →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 2 cyclic import chains detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ducks-modular-redux | kit | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,564 | 20,623 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 1d ago |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 36 | 953 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 2 |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? erikras/ducks-modular-redux · sveltejs/kit
Ask AI about erikras/ducks-modular-redux vs sveltejs/kit
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.