ever-co/ever-gauzy vs frappe/crm
frappe/crm shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, crm shows healthier maintenance signals than ever-gauzy. crm rates Healthy overall while ever-gauzy rates Mixed. ever-gauzy was committed to 2 weeks ago with 3+ active contributors, while crm was committed to 2 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the AGPL-3.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ever-co/ever-gauzy
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
frappe/crm
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ever-gauzy | crm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,351 | 3,428 |
| Last commit | 18d ago | 19d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 457 | 309 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 7% | 27% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ever-co/ever-gauzy · frappe/crm
Ask AI about ever-co/ever-gauzy vs frappe/crm
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.