exrick/xmall vs seleniumhq/selenium
seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than xmall. selenium rates Healthy overall while xmall rates Concerns. xmall last saw a commit 3 years ago with 1+ active contributor, while selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors. xmall is GPL-3.0-licensed while selenium is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
exrick/xmall →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 3y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
seleniumhq/selenium →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| xmall | selenium | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,232 | 34,146 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 24d ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 45 | 186 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? exrick/xmall · seleniumhq/selenium
Ask AI about exrick/xmall vs seleniumhq/selenium
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.