RepoPilot

f/prompts.chat vs ossu/computer-science

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, prompts.chat and computer-science both show healthy maintenance signals. prompts.chat was committed to today with 39+ active contributors, while computer-science was committed to 1 day ago with 30+ active contributors. prompts.chat is Other-licensed while computer-science is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

f/prompts.chat

Healthy

Healthy across the board

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 39+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 10% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

ossu/computer-science

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 30+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

prompts.chatcomputer-science
Stars164,434205,316
Last committoday1d ago
LicenseOtherMIT
Open issues6023
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage40%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? f/prompts.chat · ossu/computer-science

Ask AI about f/prompts.chat vs ossu/computer-science

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.