f/prompts.chat vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
f/prompts.chat shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, prompts.chat shows healthier maintenance signals than sjmoran.github.io. prompts.chat rates Healthy overall while sjmoran.github.io rates Mixed. prompts.chat was committed to today with 39+ active contributors, while sjmoran.github.io was committed to today with 1+ active contributor. prompts.chat is Other-licensed while sjmoran.github.io is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
f/prompts.chat →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓39+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 10% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| prompts.chat | sjmoran.github.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 164,434 | 1 |
| Last commit | today | today |
| License | Other | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 60 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 40% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? f/prompts.chat · sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Ask AI about f/prompts.chat vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.