facebook/proxygen vs hyprwm/hyprland
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, proxygen and hyprland both show healthy maintenance signals. proxygen last saw a commit 1 month ago with 25+ active contributors, while hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors. proxygen is Other-licensed while hyprland is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
facebook/proxygen →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 21% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| proxygen | hyprland | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,345 | 35,578 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 37 | 185 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 41% | 23% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? facebook/proxygen · hyprwm/hyprland
Ask AI about facebook/proxygen vs hyprwm/hyprland
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.