facebookexperimental/recoil vs mozilla/browserquest
facebookexperimental/recoil shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, recoil shows healthier maintenance signals than browserquest. recoil rates Healthy overall while browserquest rates Mixed. recoil last saw a commit 1 year ago with 34+ active contributors, while browserquest last saw a commit 2 years ago with 4+ active contributors. recoil is MIT-licensed while browserquest is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
facebookexperimental/recoil →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mozilla/browserquest →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 3y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| recoil | browserquest | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,487 | 9,364 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 322 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 42% | 5% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? facebookexperimental/recoil · mozilla/browserquest
Ask AI about facebookexperimental/recoil vs mozilla/browserquest
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.