facebookexperimental/recoil vs piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, recoil and claude-code-system-prompts both show mixed maintenance signals. recoil last saw a commit 1 year ago with 34+ active contributors, while claude-code-system-prompts was committed to 6 days ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
facebookexperimental/recoil
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 99% of recent commits; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| recoil | claude-code-system-prompts | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,437 | 12,646 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 6d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 320 | 8 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 34% | 50% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? facebookexperimental/recoil · piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Ask AI about facebookexperimental/recoil vs piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.