facebookexperimental/recoil vs sindresorhus/p-limit
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, recoil and p-limit both show mixed maintenance signals. recoil last saw a commit 1 year ago with 34+ active contributors, while p-limit was committed to 2 weeks ago with 20+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
facebookexperimental/recoil
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
sindresorhus/p-limit
Mixed signals — read the receipts
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| recoil | p-limit | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,437 | 2,925 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 16d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 320 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 34% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? facebookexperimental/recoil · sindresorhus/p-limit
Ask AI about facebookexperimental/recoil vs sindresorhus/p-limit
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.