faker-ruby/faker vs greatghoul/remote-working
faker-ruby/faker shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, faker shows healthier maintenance signals than remote-working. faker rates Healthy overall while remote-working rates Mixed. faker last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while remote-working last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
faker-ruby/faker →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
greatghoul/remote-working →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 96% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| faker | remote-working | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11,601 | 11,577 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 21 | 1 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? faker-ruby/faker · greatghoul/remote-working
Ask AI about faker-ruby/faker vs greatghoul/remote-working
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.