fastruby/fast-ruby vs freecodecamp/devdocs
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, fast-ruby and devdocs both show mixed maintenance signals. fast-ruby last saw a commit 8 months ago with 39+ active contributors, while devdocs was committed to 1 week ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
fastruby/fast-ruby
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
test evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓39+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
freecodecamp/devdocs
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fast-ruby | devdocs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,732 | 39,416 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 12d ago |
| License | Unknown | MPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 47 | 218 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? fastruby/fast-ruby · freecodecamp/devdocs
Ask AI about fastruby/fast-ruby vs freecodecamp/devdocs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.