RepoPilot

fatedier/frp vs turbot/steampipe

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, frp and steampipe both show healthy maintenance signals. frp was committed to 2 weeks ago with 11+ active contributors, while steampipe last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. frp is Apache-2.0-licensed while steampipe is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

fatedier/frp

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 11 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

turbot/steampipe

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

frpsteampipe
Stars109,0917,915
Last commit18d ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues4921
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage59%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low
Architecture gradeA
Cycles0
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? fatedier/frp · turbot/steampipe

Ask AI about fatedier/frp vs turbot/steampipe

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.