firecrawl/firecrawl vs jestjs/jest
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, firecrawl and jest both show healthy maintenance signals. firecrawl was committed to 2 weeks ago with 17+ active contributors, while jest was committed to 4 weeks ago with 24+ active contributors. firecrawl is AGPL-3.0-licensed while jest is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
firecrawl/firecrawl
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
jestjs/jest
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| firecrawl | jest | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 175,429 | 45,468 |
| Last commit | 14d ago | 28d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 583 | 179 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 46% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 8 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? firecrawl/firecrawl · jestjs/jest
Ask AI about firecrawl/firecrawl vs jestjs/jest
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.