flipboard/bottomsheet vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, bottomsheet and disruptor both show mixed maintenance signals. bottomsheet last saw a commit 7 years ago with 20+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. bottomsheet is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
flipboard/bottomsheet
Stale — last commit 7y ago
last commit was 7y ago; test evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| bottomsheet | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,499 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 7y ago | 1y ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 55 | 17 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? flipboard/bottomsheet · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about flipboard/bottomsheet vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.