flowable/flowable-engine vs iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, flowable-engine and java-design-patterns both show healthy maintenance signals. flowable-engine was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors, while java-design-patterns was committed to 2 weeks ago with 34+ active contributors. flowable-engine is Apache-2.0-licensed while java-design-patterns is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
flowable/flowable-engine
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| flowable-engine | java-design-patterns | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,514 | 94,651 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 14d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 408 | 128 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? flowable/flowable-engine · iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Ask AI about flowable/flowable-engine vs iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.