flowable/flowable-engine vs kestra-io/kestra
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, flowable-engine and kestra both show healthy maintenance signals. flowable-engine was committed to 2 weeks ago with 17+ active contributors, while kestra was committed to 1 week ago with 27+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
flowable/flowable-engine
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
kestra-io/kestra
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 20% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| flowable-engine | kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,514 | 28,015 |
| Last commit | 14d ago | 9d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 408 | 657 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 91% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? flowable/flowable-engine · kestra-io/kestra
Ask AI about flowable/flowable-engine vs kestra-io/kestra
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.