fluent/fluentd vs macournoyer/thin
fluent/fluentd shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fluentd shows healthier maintenance signals than thin. fluentd rates Healthy overall while thin rates Mixed. fluentd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 10+ active contributors, while thin last saw a commit 1 year ago with 32+ active contributors. fluentd is Apache-2.0-licensed while thin is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
fluent/fluentd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
macournoyer/thin →
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓32+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fluentd | thin | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 13,530 | 2,275 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 136 | 21 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? fluent/fluentd · macournoyer/thin
Ask AI about fluent/fluentd vs macournoyer/thin
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.