foundation/foundation-sites vs picocss/pico
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, foundation-sites and pico both show mixed maintenance signals. foundation-sites last saw a commit 1 year ago with 12+ active contributors, while pico last saw a commit 4 months ago with 17+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
foundation/foundation-sites
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠2 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
picocss/pico
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| foundation-sites | pico | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,784 | 16,827 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 80 | 124 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? foundation/foundation-sites · picocss/pico
Ask AI about foundation/foundation-sites vs picocss/pico
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.