foxcpp/maddy vs nsqio/nsq
nsqio/nsq shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nsq shows healthier maintenance signals than maddy. nsq rates Healthy overall while maddy rates Mixed. maddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while nsq last saw a commit 11 months ago with 20+ active contributors. maddy is GPL-3.0-licensed while nsq is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
foxcpp/maddy →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nsqio/nsq →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maddy | nsq | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,953 | 25,727 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 11mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 128 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 18% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? foxcpp/maddy · nsqio/nsq
Ask AI about foxcpp/maddy vs nsqio/nsq
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.