RepoPilot

foxcpp/maddy vs spf13/viper

spf13/viper shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, viper shows healthier maintenance signals than maddy. viper rates Healthy overall while maddy rates Mixed. maddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while viper last saw a commit 5 months ago with 11+ active contributors. maddy is GPL-3.0-licensed while viper is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

foxcpp/maddy

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 17 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

spf13/viper

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
  • Last commit 4mo ago
  • 11 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

maddyviper
Stars5,95330,244
Last commit1mo ago5mo ago
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues128128
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage18%6%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? foxcpp/maddy · spf13/viper

Ask AI about foxcpp/maddy vs spf13/viper

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.