RepoPilot

frappe/crm vs twentyhq/twenty

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, crm and twenty both show healthy maintenance signals. crm was committed to 2 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while twenty was committed to 2 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors. crm is AGPL-3.0-licensed while twenty is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

frappe/crm

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 9 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

twentyhq/twenty

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Last commit today
  • 16 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

crmtwenty
Stars3,42855,861
Last commit19d ago18d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues309180
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage27%22%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? frappe/crm · twentyhq/twenty

Ask AI about frappe/crm vs twentyhq/twenty

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.