RepoPilot

frectonz/sql-studio vs rtk-ai/rtk

rtk-ai/rtk shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, rtk shows healthier maintenance signals than sql-studio. rtk rates Healthy overall while sql-studio rates Mixed. sql-studio last saw a commit 3 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while rtk last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. sql-studio is MIT-licensed while rtk is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

frectonz/sql-studio

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 8w ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

rtk-ai/rtk

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
  • Last commit today
  • 18 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

sql-studiortk
Stars3,53843,729
Last commit3mo ago1mo ago
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Open issues1829
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%21%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? frectonz/sql-studio · rtk-ai/rtk

Ask AI about frectonz/sql-studio vs rtk-ai/rtk

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.