freecodecamp/devdocs vs mileszs/wicked_pdf
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, devdocs and wicked_pdf both show mixed maintenance signals. devdocs was committed to 1 week ago with 4+ active contributors, while wicked_pdf last saw a commit 1 year ago with 28+ active contributors. devdocs is MPL-2.0-licensed while wicked_pdf is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
freecodecamp/devdocs
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
mileszs/wicked_pdf
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓28+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| devdocs | wicked_pdf | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39,416 | 3,575 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 218 | 302 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 93% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? freecodecamp/devdocs · mileszs/wicked_pdf
Ask AI about freecodecamp/devdocs vs mileszs/wicked_pdf
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.