freecodecamp/devdocs vs scambra/devise_invitable
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, devdocs and devise_invitable both show mixed maintenance signals. devdocs was committed to 1 week ago with 4+ active contributors, while devise_invitable last saw a commit 1 month ago with 32+ active contributors. devdocs is MPL-2.0-licensed while devise_invitable is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
freecodecamp/devdocs
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
scambra/devise_invitable
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (2/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓32+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| devdocs | devise_invitable | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39,416 | 2,674 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 218 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? freecodecamp/devdocs · scambra/devise_invitable
Ask AI about freecodecamp/devdocs vs scambra/devise_invitable
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.