RepoPilot

fuellabs/fuel-core vs julien-cpsn/atac

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, fuel-core and atac both show mixed maintenance signals. fuel-core was committed to 1 week ago with 14+ active contributors, while atac was committed to 1 week ago with 10+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

fuellabs/fuel-core

Mixed

Evidence incomplete — review before adopting

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 14 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

julien-cpsn/atac

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
  • No tests detected in the complete Git tree
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 10 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

fuel-coreatac
Stars56,8633,715
Last commit11d ago13d ago
LicenseUnknownMIT
Open issues20020
Has testsNo
Has CI
Test coverage18%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture gradeAC
Cycles08
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? fuellabs/fuel-core · julien-cpsn/atac

Ask AI about fuellabs/fuel-core vs julien-cpsn/atac

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.