fuellabs/fuels-rs vs ogham/dog
fuellabs/fuels-rs shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fuels-rs shows healthier maintenance signals than dog. fuels-rs rates Healthy overall while dog rates Mixed. fuels-rs last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors, while dog last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors. fuels-rs is Apache-2.0-licensed while dog is EUPL-1.2-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
fuellabs/fuels-rs →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ogham/dog →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (EUPL-1.2); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (EUPL-1.2) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓EUPL-1.2 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fuels-rs | dog | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,219 | 6,650 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | EUPL-1.2 |
| Open issues | 68 | 80 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 6% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? fuellabs/fuels-rs · ogham/dog
Ask AI about fuellabs/fuels-rs vs ogham/dog
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.