fuellabs/fuels-rs vs quipnetwork/xq-rs
fuellabs/fuels-rs shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fuels-rs shows healthier maintenance signals than xq-rs. fuels-rs rates Healthy overall while xq-rs rates Mixed. fuels-rs last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors, while xq-rs last saw a commit 2 months ago with 1+ active contributor. fuels-rs is Apache-2.0-licensed while xq-rs is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
fuellabs/fuels-rs →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
quipnetwork/xq-rs →
Solo project — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fuels-rs | xq-rs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,219 | 5,737 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 68 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 31% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? fuellabs/fuels-rs · quipnetwork/xq-rs
Ask AI about fuellabs/fuels-rs vs quipnetwork/xq-rs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.