fuellabs/fuels-rs vs xacrimon/dashmap
fuellabs/fuels-rs shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fuels-rs shows healthier maintenance signals than dashmap. fuels-rs rates Healthy overall while dashmap rates Mixed. fuels-rs last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors, while dashmap last saw a commit 1 year ago with 22+ active contributors. fuels-rs is Apache-2.0-licensed while dashmap is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
fuellabs/fuels-rs →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
xacrimon/dashmap →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fuels-rs | dashmap | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,219 | 4,027 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 68 | 80 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? fuellabs/fuels-rs · xacrimon/dashmap
Ask AI about fuellabs/fuels-rs vs xacrimon/dashmap
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.