galetahub/ckeditor vs hashicorp/vagrant
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ckeditor and vagrant both show mixed maintenance signals. ckeditor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while vagrant was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
galetahub/ckeditor
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
hashicorp/vagrant
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ckeditor | vagrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,224 | 27,206 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 14d ago |
| License | MIT | Unknown |
| Open issues | 16 | 751 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 80% | 56% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? galetahub/ckeditor · hashicorp/vagrant
Ask AI about galetahub/ckeditor vs hashicorp/vagrant
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.