getsentry/sentry-javascript vs tanstack/query
getsentry/sentry-javascript shows stronger signals overall
As of July 2026, sentry-javascript shows healthier maintenance signals than query. sentry-javascript rates Healthy overall while query rates Mixed. sentry-javascript last saw a commit 1 month ago with 16+ active contributors, while query was committed to today with 18+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
getsentry/sentry-javascript
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tanstack/query
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| sentry-javascript | query | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,657 | 49,974 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | today |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 595 | 191 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 61% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? getsentry/sentry-javascript · tanstack/query
Ask AI about getsentry/sentry-javascript vs tanstack/query
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.